=================================================================
No  heroine,  in recent times, has got her act  together  on  the
silver screen the way Madhuri Dixit has done. Girija Rajendran on
the spell Madhuri Dixit casts on the audience.
=================================================================

        The  admiration  for  the  spell  the   charmer-performer
Madhuri  Dixit cast on the audience has not abated. The  ultimate
accolade  came  this  superstar's way as the  Bombay  film  trade
acknowledged her as another Amitabh Bachchan. Every best  actress
award going was Madhuri's.

        No heroine, in recent times, has got her act together  on
the silver screen the way Madhuri Dixit has done. So much so that
Madhuri  today  is  looked upon as  a  seven-letter  synonym  for
success.  Not without reason is M. F. Husain still obsessed  with
this  artiste  whom he, not too long ago, literally  sketched  as
``The Dhak-Dhak Girl.''

        Not the least noteworthy part of Madhuri's persona is her
ability  to carry off a ``Choli Ke Peechche Kya Hai''  situation.
THe  lady has style. Without style, Madhuri could not have  taken
over from Sridevi with such poise.

        There  was a brief spell when Madhuri Dixit looked to  be
threatened by Juhi Chawla. But along came ``Hum Aapke Hain Koun''
to  change  it all. Would Juhi Chawla have got  as  near  Madhuri
Dixit as she did had Divya Bharati not gone off the scene?  Would
the path have opened for even Madhuri the way it has done today?

        The point is Divya Bharati is gone, and Madhuri has  come
to  stay. One saw the spark in Madhuri in ``Sangeet'' itself.  K.
Viswanath's  deft  direction saw Madhuri excel here,  in  a  dual
role,  fairly  early in her career. Madhuri has come a  long  way
since. Today, the first five slots among heroines belong to  her.
Only after that do others come into the reckoning.

        But  Madhuri  has  not let all this  upset  her  achiever
equilibrium. Convent-educated and well versed in Kathak,  Madhuri
speaks  of her advance with all the advantage of being  well-read
and  well-bred. As the tide turned for her with ``Hum Aapke  Hain
Koun''  (the  film in which she sported that Rs.  15  lakh  worth
sari),  Madhuri  noted:  The attitudes  and  opinions  of  people
changed,  the  way they looked at me changed, but  I  refused  to
change. The only thing that changed in me was my determination. I
was  determined  to be known as one of the best, even  the  best,
among actresses.''

        There is ample evidence by now to show that Madhuri Dixit  
is  not  only  one of the better-looking but one  of  the  better
actresses. In the commercial circuit, Madhuri is being spoken  of
in  the  same  breath as Hema Malini  once  was.Such  was  Hema's
dominance that Sridevi's initial years were spent in seeing  this
megastar  off.  Madhuri,  by contrast, has  no  real  competition
today.  So  overpowering  is  her  image  that  it  tends  to  be
overlooked that Madhuri is on top of the film world only after  a
full decade of slog.

        Slog it never looked because Madhuri had this cosy way of
sliding into any role. She made her ``middle-class  Maharashtrian
family''  looks her `girl-next-door' asset. It is on  this  asset
that  Madhuri  rides the crest of a wave. Yet  Madhuri  has  been
compared to Madhubala in looks.

        The resemblance is fleetingly there from certain  angles.
But  it  would be safe to assert that Madhuri,  in  the  ultimate
analysis, has made it by being pre-eminently herself. ``You  have
to be born with talent,'' Madhuri acknowledges. ``But that talent
has  to  be sharpened, chiselled, sculpted and given  a  shape.''
Things  looked  bleak  indeed for Madhuri as  she  did  Rajshri's
`Aboddh'  and  ``the  film was declared a disaster  at  the  box-
office,''  on  her  own admission. But the  same  Rajshri  people
rediscovered her, and how, with ``Hum Aapke Hain Koun.''

        In  between,  Madhuri had the great good  luck  of  being
spotted  and groomed by a showman like Subhash Ghai ``who  taught
me lessons I can never forget.'' Ghai's ``Ram Lakhan'' came as  a
remarkable  hat-trick  for Madhuri after  ``Tesaab''  and  ``Prem
Pratiggya.''

        Likewise,  Ghai's ``Khal-Nayak'' signalled a double  hat-
trick  for  her  in the wake of ``Dil''  and  ``Beta.''  Such  is
Madhuri's  aura  today that she puts in the shade even  the  hero
playing ``Raja''.

        Inevitably,  the  old movie cliche is being  reworked  to
ask:  ``Will  success spoil Madhuri Dixit?''  To  that  Madhuri's
counter is: ``I am not crazy about fame, about money, about being
the number one.

        My  happiest  moment will be when I am  recognised  as  a
great actress. They say I am ``the lady Amitabh Bachchan,''  that
I  am the only female star who can carry a film. I listen to  all
this. It sounds nice. But I refuse  I repeat, refuse  to let  any
talk like that go to my head.''

        Humility is a quality Madhuri can act out by now. But the
entire conduct of her career has been such that one believes when
she says she is sighting the real peak only now. It is gratifying
to  know  the razzle-dazzle of commercial cinema  does  not  have
Madhuri  in its thrall, that she wants to grow, if they will  let
her.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Though the celluloid siren is a figure long gone from Hollywood, India's silver screens still shimmer with singing Venuses like Madhuri Dixit. After breaking into films at 16, she managed to avoid the fast fade-out all too common among career girls in Bollywood. Now 28, Dixit commands an estimated $150,000 a film, plus near divine status. India's best-known painter, 80-year-old M.F. Hussain, was so smitten with one Dixit film that he devoted a series of canvases to the star, whom he extols as "the symbol of Indian womanhood." One of her recent successes was Khalnayak, a 1993 love story, in which she lip-synched and danced to a lyric that caused heartburn among conservatives. "What is beneath the blouse?" she is asked. Her reply: "My heart." Then came the 1994 megahit Hum Apke Hain Kaun, in which Dixit played a woman who agrees to marry for duty over love; by film's end, naturally, she is reunited with the man closest to her, um, blouse. Dixit has classical-dance training and revels in the musical demands made on Indian film actresses. "Our culture is totally immersed in music and dancing," she says. "Music is a part of our lives"--and best appreciated when it comes from the lips of sirens. -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though the celluloid siren is a figure long gone from Hollywood, India's silver screens still shimmer with singing Venuses like Madhuri Dixit. After breaking into films at 16, she managed to avoid the fast fade-out all too common among career girls in Bollywood. Now 28, Dixit commands an estimated $150,000 a film, plus near divine status. India's best-known painter, 80-year-old M.F. Hussain, was so smitten with one Dixit film that he devoted a series of canvases to the star, whom he extols as "the symbol of Indian womanhood." One of her recent successes was Khalnayak, a 1993 love story, in which she lip-synched and danced to a lyric that caused heartburn among conservatives. "What is beneath the blouse?" she is asked. Her reply: "My heart." Then came the 1994 megahit Hum Apke Hain Kaun, in which Dixit played a woman who agrees to marry for duty over love; by film's end, naturally, she is reunited with the man closest to her, um, blouse. Dixit has classical-dance training and revels in the musical demands made on Indian film actresses. "Our culture is totally immersed in music and dancing," she says. "Music is a part of our lives"--and best appreciated when it comes from the lips of sirens.